Artificial intelligence (AI) policy: ASHRAE prohibits the entry of content from any ASHRAE publication or related ASHRAE intellectual property (IP) into any AI tool, including but not limited to ChatGPT. Additionally, creating derivative works of ASHRAE IP using AI is also prohibited without express written permission from ASHRAE.

Close
logoShaping Tomorrow’s Built Environment Today

Inhaled Mass and Particle Removal Dynamics in Commercial Buildings And Aircraft Cabins

By STEPHEN TRENT; ANGELA DAVIS; TATEH WU, PH.D.; DANNY MENARD; JOSHUA J. CUMMINS, PH.D.; JOSHUA L. SANTARPIA, PH.D.; NELS OLSON, PH.D.

Share This

©2022 This excerpt taken from the article of the same name which appeared in ASHRAE Journal, vol. 64, no. 7, July 2022.

About the Authors
Stephen Trent is an engineer in the Cabin Environment/Air Quality group within Environmental Control Systems for Boeing Commercial Airplanes. He is the vice chair of ASHRAE Standard 161 and TC 9.3. Angela Davis is a materials and chemical engineer within the Chemical Technology group in Boeing Research and Technology. Tateh Wu, Ph.D., is an asso¬ciate technical fellow of Boeing Commercial Airplanes in the Environmental Control Systems (ECS) organization. Danny Menard is a flight engineer in Boeing Defense, Space and Security. Josh Cummins, Ph.D., is the probabilistic analytics team lead and a senior manager in Boeing’s Safety Management System for Boeing Global Services and Boeing Test and Evaluation. Joshua L. Santarpia, Ph.D., is the research director for Counter WMD programs at the National Strategic Research Institute, associate professor of microbiology and pathology and program director for Biodefense and Health Security Degree Program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Nels Olson, Ph.D., is an analytical chemist with over 43 years of experience working in engineering, biotechnology and aerospace industrial and academic environments


Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of an aircraft cabin and an indoor commercial space (ICS) were used to characterize the spread of aerosols generated by a coughing or breathing person suffering from a respiratory illness. Occupant expo­sure to these aerosols was then compared between the ICS and the aircraft cabin. The lifetime of the aerosols, system designs and airflow patterns that reduce their concentration over time were also examined. Differences between steady state and well-mixed conditions were identified and comparisons made between the model environments. The CFD analysis results were also compared to empirical data from a U.S. Transportation Command study that tracked particles introduced by simulated infectious individuals in an airplane cabin environment.

From March 2020 to October 2020, only 44 known cases of COVID-19 were transmitted in the air travel sys­tem while 1.2 billion passengers traveled by air world­wide.1,2 While this transmission rate is certainly under­counted, other studies tracking cases in the air travel system also show very low transmission rates amongst occupants.1 The low risk of transmission may be aided by the multilayered approach adopted by airlines, regu­lators and other organizations to keep passengers and flight crews healthy.3 This approach includes physi­cal distancing, masking, vaccinations, washing hands, avoiding travel for individuals feeling unwell and disin­fecting the airplane cabin and flight deck.

However, even with these additional precautions, an infectious person may still be onboard. Therefore, additional studies were undertaken to characterize the aircraft cabin airflow and understand why the risk of transmission was lower than might be expected for an indoor commercial space (ICS).


Read the Full Article

ASHRAE Members have free access to the full-text PDF of this article as well as the complete ASHRAE Journal archives back to 1997 in the Free Member Access Area.

Non-members can purchase features from the ASHRAE Bookstore. Or, Join ASHRAE!


Return to Featured Article Excerpts

Return to ASHRAE Journal Featured Article Excerpts

Close